humiliateme > 12/10/2011, 22:13
Chillblane > 13/10/2011, 00:03
(12/10/2011, 21:07)braveheart.1965 Wrote: sociaty was the weirdest film ive ever saw
(12/10/2011, 22:13)humiliateme Wrote: i realise i may be on my own here, but i'm gonna say......... AVATAR
i thought it was a massive pile of wank, it was basically the smurfs crossed with dances with wolves
and the thing that really gets me is most people go on and on about the cgi, and yeah it was good but i'm sorry i look for a little more in "the best film ever" than just having good cgi. in my opinion the cgi was the only good thing about it, i really honestly don't see what all the fuss was about. i mean the mineral the wanted was called "unobtainium" !!!! for gods sake unobtainium!!!!!
jesslloydfan > 15/10/2011, 02:47
(12/10/2011, 22:13)humiliateme Wrote: i realise i may be on my own here, but i'm gonna say......... AVATARYou`re not on your own, i hated Avatar, that film has a story thats totally ripped off other films not one original plot point in it, but with overgrown smurfs,
i thought it was a massive pile of wank, it was basically the smurfs crossed with dances with wolves
and the thing that really gets me is most people go on and on about the cgi, and yeah it was good but i'm sorry i look for a little more in "the best film ever" than just having good cgi. in my opinion the cgi was the only good thing about it, i really honestly don't see what all the fuss was about. i mean the mineral the wanted was called "unobtainium" !!!! for gods sake unobtainium!!!!!
humiliateme > 15/10/2011, 03:42
(15/10/2011, 02:47)jesslloydfan Wrote:(12/10/2011, 22:13)humiliateme Wrote: i realise i may be on my own here, but i'm gonna say......... AVATARYou`re not on your own, i hated Avatar, that film has a story thats totally ripped off other films not one original plot point in it, but with overgrown smurfs,
i thought it was a massive pile of wank, it was basically the smurfs crossed with dances with wolves
and the thing that really gets me is most people go on and on about the cgi, and yeah it was good but i'm sorry i look for a little more in "the best film ever" than just having good cgi. in my opinion the cgi was the only good thing about it, i really honestly don't see what all the fuss was about. i mean the mineral the wanted was called "unobtainium" !!!! for gods sake unobtainium!!!!!
i didn`t even find the visuals that impressive to be honest, i just thought it was terrible, oh and sam worthington is a terrible actor so wooden how he gets parts in any film is a mystery to me.
jesslloydfan > 15/10/2011, 17:05
(15/10/2011, 03:42)humiliateme Wrote:I know what you meant, i personally didn't see any of the fuss around Avatar, i basically hated that film entirely not saying i don't occasionally enjoy films for cgi, but Avatar tried so hard to be deep and meaningful when the plot is totally unoriginal and it's basically all about the effects which i didn't think were any better than films around the same time like transformers which may not be everyones favourite but at least they don't pretend to be deep films.(15/10/2011, 02:47)jesslloydfan Wrote:(12/10/2011, 22:13)humiliateme Wrote: i realise i may be on my own here, but i'm gonna say......... AVATARYou`re not on your own, i hated Avatar, that film has a story thats totally ripped off other films not one original plot point in it, but with overgrown smurfs,
i thought it was a massive pile of wank, it was basically the smurfs crossed with dances with wolves
and the thing that really gets me is most people go on and on about the cgi, and yeah it was good but i'm sorry i look for a little more in "the best film ever" than just having good cgi. in my opinion the cgi was the only good thing about it, i really honestly don't see what all the fuss was about. i mean the mineral the wanted was called "unobtainium" !!!! for gods sake unobtainium!!!!!
i didn`t even find the visuals that impressive to be honest, i just thought it was terrible, oh and sam worthington is a terrible actor so wooden how he gets parts in any film is a mystery to me.
yeah i wasn't as impressed with the graphics as everyone else seemed to be, but i just said good cgi so as to not sound like i was just blindly hating the film.
humiliateme > 15/10/2011, 17:27
(15/10/2011, 17:05)jesslloydfan Wrote:(15/10/2011, 03:42)humiliateme Wrote:I know what you meant, i personally didn't see any of the fuss around Avatar, i basically hated that film entirely not saying i don't occasionally enjoy films for cgi, but Avatar tried so hard to be deep and meaningful when the plot is totally unoriginal and it's basically all about the effects which i didn't think were any better than films around the same time like transformers which may not be everyones favourite but at least they don't pretend to be deep films.(15/10/2011, 02:47)jesslloydfan Wrote:(12/10/2011, 22:13)humiliateme Wrote: i realise i may be on my own here, but i'm gonna say......... AVATARYou`re not on your own, i hated Avatar, that film has a story thats totally ripped off other films not one original plot point in it, but with overgrown smurfs,
i thought it was a massive pile of wank, it was basically the smurfs crossed with dances with wolves
and the thing that really gets me is most people go on and on about the cgi, and yeah it was good but i'm sorry i look for a little more in "the best film ever" than just having good cgi. in my opinion the cgi was the only good thing about it, i really honestly don't see what all the fuss was about. i mean the mineral the wanted was called "unobtainium" !!!! for gods sake unobtainium!!!!!
i didn`t even find the visuals that impressive to be honest, i just thought it was terrible, oh and sam worthington is a terrible actor so wooden how he gets parts in any film is a mystery to me.
yeah i wasn't as impressed with the graphics as everyone else seemed to be, but i just said good cgi so as to not sound like i was just blindly hating the film.
Another shockingly bad film the southland tales, that film is a jumbled mess with almost zero story sense, i never thought i'd hate a film which had sarah michelle gellar starring as a porn star lol,
don't know what happened the director that did that also did donnie darko and that was really good obviously donnie darko was a fluke.
jesslloydfan > 15/10/2011, 19:04
(15/10/2011, 17:27)humiliateme Wrote:No it wasn't just you mate, the few people i've met who've seen that film none of them had a clue,(15/10/2011, 17:05)jesslloydfan Wrote:(15/10/2011, 03:42)humiliateme Wrote:I know what you meant, i personally didn't see any of the fuss around Avatar, i basically hated that film entirely not saying i don't occasionally enjoy films for cgi, but Avatar tried so hard to be deep and meaningful when the plot is totally unoriginal and it's basically all about the effects which i didn't think were any better than films around the same time like transformers which may not be everyones favourite but at least they don't pretend to be deep films.(15/10/2011, 02:47)jesslloydfan Wrote:(12/10/2011, 22:13)humiliateme Wrote: i realise i may be on my own here, but i'm gonna say......... AVATARYou`re not on your own, i hated Avatar, that film has a story thats totally ripped off other films not one original plot point in it, but with overgrown smurfs,
i thought it was a massive pile of wank, it was basically the smurfs crossed with dances with wolves
and the thing that really gets me is most people go on and on about the cgi, and yeah it was good but i'm sorry i look for a little more in "the best film ever" than just having good cgi. in my opinion the cgi was the only good thing about it, i really honestly don't see what all the fuss was about. i mean the mineral the wanted was called "unobtainium" !!!! for gods sake unobtainium!!!!!
i didn`t even find the visuals that impressive to be honest, i just thought it was terrible, oh and sam worthington is a terrible actor so wooden how he gets parts in any film is a mystery to me.
yeah i wasn't as impressed with the graphics as everyone else seemed to be, but i just said good cgi so as to not sound like i was just blindly hating the film.
Another shockingly bad film the southland tales, that film is a jumbled mess with almost zero story sense, i never thought i'd hate a film which had sarah michelle gellar starring as a porn star lol,
don't know what happened the director that did that also did donnie darko and that was really good obviously donnie darko was a fluke.
i forgot all about that film! so glad it wasn't just me who had no idea what the hell was going on in that film
humiliateme > 15/10/2011, 20:26
(15/10/2011, 19:04)jesslloydfan Wrote:(15/10/2011, 17:27)humiliateme Wrote:No it wasn't just you mate, the few people i've met who've seen that film none of them had a clue,(15/10/2011, 17:05)jesslloydfan Wrote:(15/10/2011, 03:42)humiliateme Wrote:I know what you meant, i personally didn't see any of the fuss around Avatar, i basically hated that film entirely not saying i don't occasionally enjoy films for cgi, but Avatar tried so hard to be deep and meaningful when the plot is totally unoriginal and it's basically all about the effects which i didn't think were any better than films around the same time like transformers which may not be everyones favourite but at least they don't pretend to be deep films.(15/10/2011, 02:47)jesslloydfan Wrote: You`re not on your own, i hated Avatar, that film has a story thats totally ripped off other films not one original plot point in it, but with overgrown smurfs,
i didn`t even find the visuals that impressive to be honest, i just thought it was terrible, oh and sam worthington is a terrible actor so wooden how he gets parts in any film is a mystery to me.
yeah i wasn't as impressed with the graphics as everyone else seemed to be, but i just said good cgi so as to not sound like i was just blindly hating the film.
Another shockingly bad film the southland tales, that film is a jumbled mess with almost zero story sense, i never thought i'd hate a film which had sarah michelle gellar starring as a porn star lol,
don't know what happened the director that did that also did donnie darko and that was really good obviously donnie darko was a fluke.
i forgot all about that film! so glad it wasn't just me who had no idea what the hell was going on in that film
mainly because it's a terrible film with a plot that's basically a jumble of lots of bad plots smashed together, not to mention that the dialog in that film is just plain bad,
i really didn't like that film lol.
Michael31 > 16/10/2011, 13:54
braveheart.1965 > 16/10/2011, 14:05
(11/10/2011, 02:28)Chillblane Wrote: Simple premise, pick a film you loath and tell us all why it & or the person who made it should be destroyed/shot/stabbed/burned (pick one, I don't care which you choose but do choose an option)
I'm going to have to say Battlefield Earth which may not be a surprise to anyone unfortunate enough to have seen it, and I will apologise to humiliateme in advance for mentioning it again.
Possibly the lamest Sci-Fi action film ever made with bad special effects and terrible acting.
The cast could have been a lot better and so could the script.
The massive plot holes are massively unforgivable and it seems to go on forever, my ass certainly thought so at the time.
Apparently it's based on a book that John Travolta really likes and he did this to it, I'd hate to see what he does to something he doesn't like.
Follow the link below for a list of people who need stabbing for this turkey.
Avoid this at all costs and don't blame me if you decide you want to know what I'm talking about here, you have been warned!!!