Well you are an odd lot. I fear you all spend far too much time on the internet.

I present you with a naked Nip embellished with messages for his beloved, complete with some type of implement taters deep in his arris, and you throng of heathens dont bat an eyelid. However should some dullards picture hosting site not resize your thumbnails correctly all hell breaks loose. All manner of cussing and snarling breaks out, and not a single caption uttered.

You would almost think the scouse scum were top of the PL at crimbo.

Now who would have wagered a guinea on that at the start of the season !

(24/12/2013, 17:26)Hilary Briss Wrote: Well you are an odd lot. I fear you all spend far too much time on the internet.

I present you with a naked Nip embellished with messages for his beloved, complete with some type of implement taters deep in his arris, and you throng of heathens dont bat an eyelid. However should some dullards picture hosting site not resize your thumbnails correctly all hell breaks loose. All manner of cussing and snarling breaks out, and not a single caption uttered.

You would almost think the scouse scum were top of the PL at crimbo.

Now who would have wagered a guinea on that at the start of the season !

Oh contraire, Manc worrier of all Ovine, if you rub the soot from Salfords smokey tops from your eyes you will see i added a caption on the pic i returned, maybe you missed it or maybe it just didnt reach the high standards of comedic values set by the master of Mancunian mirth Mike Harding, or will this be 'Lost in Translation' too? :P

---

(23/12/2013, 15:21)clitterbug Wrote:
'Lost in Translation' ?

(24/12/2013, 17:26)Hilary Briss Wrote: Well you are an odd lot. I fear you all spend far too much time on the internet.

I present you with a naked Nip embellished with messages for his beloved, complete with some type of implement taters deep in his arris, and you throng of heathens dont bat an eyelid. However should some dullards picture hosting site not resize your thumbnails correctly all hell breaks loose. All manner of cussing and snarling breaks out, and not a single caption uttered.

You would almost think the scouse scum were top of the PL at crimbo.

Now who would have wagered a guinea on that at the start of the season !

Sigh, it takes odd to know odd Briss my ol' chap

(24/12/2013, 19:16)Outlaw1987 Wrote:

(24/12/2013, 17:26)Hilary Briss Wrote: Well you are an odd lot. I fear you all spend far too much time on the internet.

I present you with a naked Nip embellished with messages for his beloved, complete with some type of implement taters deep in his arris, and you throng of heathens dont bat an eyelid. However should some dullards picture hosting site not resize your thumbnails correctly all hell breaks loose. All manner of cussing and snarling breaks out, and not a single caption uttered.

You would almost think the scouse scum were top of the PL at crimbo.

Now who would have wagered a guinea on that at the start of the season !

Sigh, it takes odd to know odd Briss my ol' chap

Humbug.

Briss' new lover doesn't seem to be taking the hint too well, maybe it's being lost in translation

Could use further assistance on this one Clit :P

Whats with the Peace fingers in all his pics, who's he think he is RINGO?

(23/12/2013, 18:58)clitterbug Wrote: Spot on Russy it is a bag of piss! i only use it to add 1 last large pic to my pic'posts, for the rest of the pics i STILL use turboimage.

Licme is good as in as much as its quick loading, but you cant just add smaller images, if you want to load pics like i or you or a few others do, you cant without 'resizing' everything, no matter what you use 'best fit, 100/160/200/260/360' they all come out the same, fuckn page filling massive pics!!! and as you say the 'Square Cropped' is pointless! Good we still got Turbo, coz if i had to take the time to resize every single large image so they would load like Turbo does i dont think id have the patience to carry on, id just make posts with 1 big fuckoff picture!

Heres an example, 1st Turbo 'Large Thumb 350' i can load 8 of these side by side and they just fill the screen nicely, 2nd Licme 'Best Fit 100' without 'resizing' is just TOO FUCKING BIG!!

https://lic.me/i/10fy6

It looks to me like you are copying the image link, rather than the thumbnail link.


When uploaded, lic.me generates 2 versions, the full one, and the resized thumbnail.

The full-sized image is given https://lic.me/i/xxxxx, and the thumbnail is https://lic.me/t/xxxxx

if at any point you are copying the thumb link and you get a /i/ url, just swap the i to a t :)

Quote:and if you try to upload multiple images then it tries to upload them altogether, not one at a time, and then they're all out of order!!! so you get #2,#6,#,1,#5,#3,#4 as an example when you copy to the clipboard, and god forbid you try to upload more than 8 or 9 as it just won't do it!!!

Images are uploaded at the same time, so the smaller file sizes are going to finish first and be out of order, usually this doesn't matter but if you need them in some sort of order then probably best to do it one at a time.

The multiple image uploaded is shite for internet explorer users, regardless of version, this is because internet explorer IS shite. In my experiments, if one image fails during the upload, it force reloads the page, cancelling all current uploads. In less-shit browsers I have been able to upload up to 20 images in one go.

(02/01/2014, 10:47)iamme Wrote:

Quote:and if you try to upload multiple images then it tries to upload them altogether, not one at a time, and then they're all out of order!!! so you get #2,#6,#,1,#5,#3,#4 as an example when you copy to the clipboard, and god forbid you try to upload more than 8 or 9 as it just won't do it!!!

Images are uploaded at the same time, so the smaller file sizes are going to finish first and be out of order, usually this doesn't matter but if you need them in some sort of order then probably best to do it one at a time.

The multiple image uploaded is shite for internet explorer users, regardless of version, this is because internet explorer IS shite. In my experiments, if one image fails during the upload, it force reloads the page, cancelling all current uploads. In less-shit browsers I have been able to upload up to 20 images in one go.

IE may not be the best but it works fine on all the other image hosts, and if you're providing a service then you need to make sure it works for all users not just the less shite ones...

It's pretty irrelevant now anyway, since pics no longer count for points there is no need to be forced to use lic.me,

OMG. Thanks iamme you responded to the private message that I sent to you. At least someone from the team got back to us. Well done.

I'll try out your suggestion iamme: "When uploaded, lic.me generates 2 versions, the full one, and the resized thumbnail.

The full-sized image is given https://lic.me/i/xxxxx, and the thumbnail is https://lic.me/t/xxxxx

if at any point you are copying the thumb link and you get a /i/ url, just swap the i to a t Smile". This little change will make the world of difference. Much appreciated iamme.

Good points made here Russy :"and if you try to upload multiple images then it tries to upload them altogether, not one at a time, and then they're all out of order!!! so you get #2,#6,#,1,#5,#3,#4 as an example when you copy to the clipboard, and god forbid you try to upload more than 8 or 9 as it just won't do it!!!" I know exactly what you mean. I've experienced it myself.

"IE may not be the best but it works fine on all the other image hosts, and if you're providing a service then you need to make sure it works for all users not just the less shite ones...

It's pretty irrelevant now anyway, since pics no longer count for points there is no need to be forced to use lic.me,"

Russy. I may be wrong but I have the feeling the site is aiming to force us to use lic.me as I not long ago used turbo and noticed that a few points were gone afterwards. Whereas yesterday I made a correction when using lic.me for a cap and lost one taking out and correcting the cap before re posting it again . Maybe it was 5 points for the cap edit yesterday but would have thought the points lost would have all been deducted straight away rather than the 1 point, then the rest later. Totally agree. Service should work for users and it shouldn't make a difference what image host is used as points for images no longer count. Everything should just stay the same.

mmm