- Options
- Login
- Desktop Style
- Recent Posts
- Most Popular
Options
Quality of Sexstation slipping
- Quality of Sexstation slipping
-
Quality of Sexstation slipping
warchylduk > 11/10/2012, 11:01
This is not a thread to have a go at sexstation but to raise concerns about i show i really enjoy watching.
As well all know there have been a lot of changes over the last few months.
1. The new show hours : I understand there reason for changing this has during the week in the early hours of the morning they probably weren't getting many call and it would cost them a lot to run the shows if they aren't making money it doesn't make sense to be on air during those's times. I wish they would start before 9 am though as i have heard a lot of people saying they enjoyed and early morning wank before work . I think 7 am would be a good time to start.
2. The schedule button . I am in favour of having a schedule on the site everyone can access has it should stop as many people asking the babes who on next in the chat box . But my problem with the schedule is it most often is out of date , especially on weekends . this makes the sites look like it isn't well maintained . I hope they get this sorted out.
3.Image quality of feeds : This is probably everyone's biggest bug bare at this moment in time . I raise this issue on the forum and in the chatbox not to have a go but just to make sure sure the site is the best site out there . We have some of the hottest babes on your screens and i feel its a let down when the screen is blurry . which makes it hard to watch . Its only got bad over the last few months. i don't know whether its software, cameras,severs or the internet that's to blame. But i hope they sort it out soon.
4. Babes chatting with us on chatbox : This might be me but i have noticed the babes have stopped chatting with us on mic when they not on call . I know not all babes enjoy doing this which is fine by me but i remember have good times chatting with a group of forum members and which ever babe was on at the time . I think l engaging with the viewers the viewers via the mic and chatbox is much better than shaking the phone and just coming on the mic and saying basically call me now then putting the mic down .
Well thoses are my views so what do you guys think ?
-
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
Clitterbug > 11/10/2012, 12:28
warchyld i gotta agree, i too enjoy the site, i like writting in the forum as much as the watching the babes and your right a couple of simple changes would improve the site no end, of your points number 1' to be honest duznt effect me as im rarely awake at that time but i can understand the guys who tuned in early missing it, 2' the schedule is more often than not worng, 3' the pic quality on Rampant is far inferior to ANY of the other channels whitch is a great shame as rampant is the best channel, ive commented on this point several times in the 'high defintion' thread please refer to that for a more concise moan lol, 4' i too enjoy a bit of banter in the chatbox, not just the usual oooh show us your pussy/ass/tits/feet ect and if the babes join in all the better, danielle nearly always engages with the viewers in the chatbox and for that 'amongst other things' she is my favorite, if the said 4 points were addressed Rampant would tower above the rest. -
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
lyates2000 > 11/10/2012, 14:12
Totally agree!! i personally think they do not have the right people (or amount of people) to deal with the tech side of things!! yesterday on the office set it looked almost dark!! it made me not ring! They seem to also have problems with the recording which i think is one of the best assets rampant has! They need a couple of computer geeks!! im sure a few people would help if they got to be in the studio for free! -
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
raylovschicks > 11/10/2012, 19:51
I Agree with it all and the other threads it doesn,t REALLY look that different from when i 1st joined 1 year ago,,but cos they done a really great thing by adding the other channels we have noticed a big difference with our pic quality compared to the other channels,,it should be highlighted this is not good enough really in the days of hd streaming,,but its not as bad as babestation now there pic quality is SHITE... -
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
sweater > 11/10/2012, 23:21
Great points made warchylduk
Point 1 is understandable on both side, would be nice for an early wank but they probably don't make enough money. I see number 4 as being down to the individual girls, perhaps there is less banter with the chat box now part of that might be due to the influx of new girls too?
I think points 2&3 are more important issues. The schedule should really be updated daily even if it does change slightly during the day and becomes incorrect. That's minor compared to the cam quality. I'm not complaining, it's a great site and the girls are far better than the competition, but when you look at every other feed on rampant.tv you begin to realise how low the quality is on sexstation. It's such a shame.
Still love sexstation tho
:)
-
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
Clitterbug > 11/10/2012, 23:30
sweater yea 2 and 3 are important points, ive just posted a poll here today, twenty odd views but only 4 votes on it! vote on it, it could make all the difference. -
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
warchylduk > 11/10/2012, 23:39
-
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
Banjo > 11/10/2012, 23:48
(11/10/2012, 23:39)warchylduk Wrote:
(11/10/2012, 23:30)clitterbug Wrote: sweater yea 2 and 3 are important points, ive just posted a poll here today, twenty odd views but only 4 votes on it! vote on it, it could make all the difference.
its amazing how many views you can get on a thread but hardly any votes on a poll
Voting now....totally agree. :)
-
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
burns72 > 12/10/2012, 01:12
Agree would be better if show started at 7am. Schedule should really be up to date especially as the Daily Rampant doesn't get sent out very often.
Quality of the feed is hit and miss.
The banter is lacking with the girls especially during quiet periods I have had some great nights swapping banter with the chat and the girls joining in 2 of the best are Bonnie and Raegan they love joining in. -
RE: Quality of Sexstation slipping
humiliateme > 12/10/2012, 06:15
as normal i pretty much agree with all your points warchyld. the one about the new show times i agree with but it doesn't really affect me.
i too remember the good ol days of chatting with the babes and having a laugh in the chatbox, that stopping is one of the reasons i've kind of dissapered recently. I know that as you say not all girls liked it, but when you log on and just see a chat box full of "show me your tits" etc.. and nothing else it kind of defeats the point of having the chat box
the one that i and most others really agree with though is the feed quality, it's shockingly bad. i agree other channels on rampant may be worst but that doesn't make the sexstation feed acceptable, as has been said in this day and age it's just plain crap. the thing that really annoys me about it is that you can understand why the others may not have great feeds as maybe most of there money comes from and therefor goes towards making the tv version as good as possible, however sexstation is on-line only so they've got no where else to be spending money and the feed quality is the only thing really letting them down, they have good women, good lighting/saturation/hue etc.. 99% of the time which 99% of the time the tv channels don't get right and they end up with (even more) orange women or bleached out bright lights etc... and yet we're still left with a seriously crappy feed quality.
sure some people might say it looks fine to me, but i'm sure if they were truly honest and compared it to quality that's available on other sites (not just porn) they realise how bad it was, well either that or they have a rubbish connection so everything looks that bad to them lol.
oh another thing sexstation does right that the tv channels get wrong is that they don't cover up 75% of the screen with adverts trying to get you to give more money, surely the tv shows must realise they'd get more money if people could actually see the women they're meant to be calling but i digress, if sexstation get's a decent quality feed i'm sure they would see there profits rise a lot as they'd be the best by a long long way