raylovschicks > 31/10/2012, 14:58
(31/10/2012, 13:33)dVIOUS Wrote:fuk no,,better cameras mean lots of money which means higher charges for us,,no keep the cost down on both,,but it used be ok about 6months ago,,so something has gone wrong somewhere,,ever since you put the other channels on here,,its been complaint after complaint cos we,ve had something to compare the picture to,,if the fence aint broke dont fix it...(31/10/2012, 10:44)Timm24 Wrote: i don't know if it isn't the stream maybe, like the speed of the connection or whatever, cuz has anyone noticed how the videos in the videos section, like those recorded of the show, are much better quality than the stream itself.
That's because the player on the tube is much smaller than the large player on the homepage. If you go full screen, it's just as bad.
I'll look into this and try see what we can do to improve the quality. Hopefully by getting new cameras :D
Timm24 > 31/10/2012, 15:28
(31/10/2012, 14:58)raylovschicks Wrote:(31/10/2012, 13:33)dVIOUS Wrote:fuk no,,better cameras mean lots of money which means higher charges for us,,no keep the cost down on both,,but it used be ok about 6months ago,,so something has gone wrong somewhere,,ever since you put the other channels on here,,its been complaint after complaint cos we,ve had something to compare the picture to,,if the fence aint broke dont fix it...(31/10/2012, 10:44)Timm24 Wrote: i don't know if it isn't the stream maybe, like the speed of the connection or whatever, cuz has anyone noticed how the videos in the videos section, like those recorded of the show, are much better quality than the stream itself.
That's because the player on the tube is much smaller than the large player on the homepage. If you go full screen, it's just as bad.
I'll look into this and try see what we can do to improve the quality. Hopefully by getting new cameras :D
raylovschicks > 31/10/2012, 15:35
(31/10/2012, 15:28)Timm24 Wrote:i disagree with your statement,,you complained about this being worse than studio66,,but my pic here was much better,,no they dont charge more YET...(31/10/2012, 14:58)raylovschicks Wrote:(31/10/2012, 13:33)dVIOUS Wrote:fuk no,,better cameras mean lots of money which means higher charges for us,,no keep the cost down on both,,but it used be ok about 6months ago,,so something has gone wrong somewhere,,ever since you put the other channels on here,,its been complaint after complaint cos we,ve had something to compare the picture to,,if the fence aint broke dont fix it...(31/10/2012, 10:44)Timm24 Wrote: i don't know if it isn't the stream maybe, like the speed of the connection or whatever, cuz has anyone noticed how the videos in the videos section, like those recorded of the show, are much better quality than the stream itself.
That's because the player on the tube is much smaller than the large player on the homepage. If you go full screen, it's just as bad.
I'll look into this and try see what we can do to improve the quality. Hopefully by getting new cameras :D
I disagree. rampant don't charge more money and they have better cam quality. fukk it, there are regular CAM SITES with girls on there who have bought cameras in, like, currys or something that have a better stream.
i'm not talking freakin 3D super HD hollywood, but i think a basic HDish standard can be achieved with no extra charges, but will attract more callers...
Clitterbug > 31/10/2012, 15:41
raylovschicks > 31/10/2012, 15:43
humiliateme > 31/10/2012, 16:00
Timm24 > 31/10/2012, 16:02
(31/10/2012, 15:35)raylovschicks Wrote:(31/10/2012, 15:28)Timm24 Wrote:i disagree with your statement,,you complained about this being worse than studio66,,but my pic here was much better,,no they dont charge more YET...(31/10/2012, 14:58)raylovschicks Wrote:(31/10/2012, 13:33)dVIOUS Wrote:fuk no,,better cameras mean lots of money which means higher charges for us,,no keep the cost down on both,,but it used be ok about 6months ago,,so something has gone wrong somewhere,,ever since you put the other channels on here,,its been complaint after complaint cos we,ve had something to compare the picture to,,if the fence aint broke dont fix it...(31/10/2012, 10:44)Timm24 Wrote: i don't know if it isn't the stream maybe, like the speed of the connection or whatever, cuz has anyone noticed how the videos in the videos section, like those recorded of the show, are much better quality than the stream itself.
That's because the player on the tube is much smaller than the large player on the homepage. If you go full screen, it's just as bad.
I'll look into this and try see what we can do to improve the quality. Hopefully by getting new cameras :D
I disagree. rampant don't charge more money and they have better cam quality. fukk it, there are regular CAM SITES with girls on there who have bought cameras in, like, currys or something that have a better stream.
i'm not talking freakin 3D super HD hollywood, but i think a basic HDish standard can be achieved with no extra charges, but will attract more callers...
raylovschicks > 31/10/2012, 16:03
Timm24 > 31/10/2012, 16:05
(31/10/2012, 15:41)clitterbug Wrote: Fuckinel guys this thread has had more interest/reps in the last couple of days than it did in the previous month, thanx for expressing your views maybe something will now be dun, as timm24 just said, and me in a previous post, we dont need hollywood cams just a decent 1, i picked up an action cam off ebay to strap to the dogs collar on the beach, its 1080p the pic is fuckin spot on, it cost me £40, fuck ill give Rampant the £40 myself if it helps! or they can borrow my cam, ill come down to the Rampant studio n show the girls how to fasten it to a dildo for some gyno shots! lol!
humiliateme > 31/10/2012, 16:06
(31/10/2012, 16:03)raylovschicks Wrote: WELL WELL WELL MY PICS OK AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN,,WHAT THE FUK DO YOU WANT FOR NOTHUNG...