Options

Nana-

Nana-
RE: Nana-

mark.s.. > 15/12/2018, 15:42

fair points will. all I can say is, she's now being very sexy. I've complained? about her in the past, but that was my fault. cultural and language misunderstandings. now I know her better and vice versa, all good. true, some things she has done to members here are pretty dicey
RE: Nana-

mikey99 > 15/12/2018, 17:55

The unfortunate thing, IMHO, is that the girls have got it in their heads that the reason their business is down is because there is a massive freeloader population that is watching but not paying. That certainly is true to some extent, but these channels have been that way since day one, what, 15 years now? The enterprise is built on the premise that the presenters, through whatever means, will entice viewers to the extent of making them willing to pay to see more nudity or more performances. But if the response to freeloading is to stop or severely limit nudity of any kind, it will discourage or drive away not only freeloaders but potential customers willing to spend money but deciding where to do it. That is why I have always advocated partial nudity when a customer calls, when it is possible - spicy hour or web camera. To me, the problems are not a massive increase in freeloading, but first of the recent banning of nudity that has only recently been relaxed and only by some girls. Second, inconsistency in performance standards, you see an amazing sexy show one shift and the next shift can be totally tame and boring, not to mention the apparent changes in policy every few months and the many failed experiments that never, ever extend to the most obvious solution - a real night show just like the BS shows. I am not sure how much the recording of shows has affected the girls, since Amy, Jasmine, and Daisy seem to have let that go. Maybe it is still a big deal for the others.
RE: Nana-

GrandDuke > 15/12/2018, 23:40

Amy seems to still perform sexily despite the cloud of recording hanging over them but that is what i think is meant by the category that Tony and myself have been put in. Of their regular customers using the forum, we are the only ones who record frequently, so it seems too much of a coincidence if that is not the reason why we are in Amy's bad books.

But imagine if no-one had recorded any of last years fabulous webshows what a bad thing that would have been for all of us. Now this website is not available in Thailand no-one can see the videos we upload there and that includes the girls. So who is telling her about this? Is it Babestation and if it is them then why are they doing it, as it will surely affect their performances and revenue negatively if the girls are made aware of it. Surely they cannot want that.
RE: Nana-

outofrack > 16/12/2018, 00:53

Wow, this Nana thread was quiet for ages and now there’s been an explosion these past couple of days!

Mark, had to laugh when you said I was a lucky fella. I’d only be lucky if I lived down the road to Nana, or even in the same country. Did you enjoy the pervcam session though?

Bucket, that was quite a harsh word you used. I appreciate your frustrations but there are better words to use (that particular body part is also a very strong muscle, so it’s actually complimentary).

Will we see a 2017 Nana for future web shows? This seems a very small step in the right direction.

Final note, I’m curious to know what she meant by the Derry & Duke bracket. I can only think a lot of this comes from Amy, but I hope it gets resolved too. I doubt she was referring to simultaneous equations.
RE: Nana-

mark.s.. > 16/12/2018, 02:14

out of, you mentioned an explosion of late, that also applies to my viewing nanas pervcam. brilliant. i'd say a BIG step was taken yesterday. What she was doing on screen, wow, I had to go to pcam then. her show really blew me away--literally
RE: Nana-

Buck > 16/12/2018, 10:15

Sorryish for my language. The builder in me is strong ?! I really don’t know what she meant by her putting Duke and Tony in a category. I was too busy fighting my own battle. I’m glad we have Mark here to be the calm head.
RE: Nana-

GrandDuke > 16/12/2018, 11:24

I agree with the statement that she has been influenced by Amy over the category Tony and I have been put in. Nana has rarely featured in my videos as she has never got me excited by any of her shows in recent times. This did change a couple of days ago when she seemed to be enjoying being sexy for the first time in quite a while.

As second in command to Amy, I think she felt she had to be seen to be backing her up by blocking me rather than her having strong feelings about it herself.
RE: Nana-

stjohn66 > 16/12/2018, 20:27

i would like to write in defence of nana. i have always found nana to be friendly and . as i am sure we all remember when the rules of thai chat were different she often did sexy shows. i had vids in my collection to prove it . grandduke gave me instructions on how to upload vids but computers i do not understand.
i had not seen nana for a long time , i visit infrequently. who can afford to call and pc all the time and when i stop by for a chat i get stick from non vips who think i am taking up the chat time ( or just want an argument ) anyway i took nana pc and said she did not need to show i only wanted to catch up on chat. but she insisted , said i might have forgotten what she looked like.
i have no objection to the girls showing just for pc or calls. it is their jobs . their living. there was a guy on today asking daisy to do all sorts and if she did he would call her. i pointed out the perv cam. he said he did not know how to use it. i explained. he did not know how to get credits. so i explained. he was just a beggar. they must get this every day so you can understand that they do not want to put the effort in when they are not goiing to get any return.
sorry to lecture. bottom line is I LIKE NANA. i like them all. and from what i can tell they are all friendly. maybe you just have to spend some time chatting with them. but give her a break. it must be tough on there all day with people making promises they have no idea of keeping.
stjohn
RE: Nana-

mikey99 > 17/12/2018, 05:10

I agree and say repeatedly that girls should show for pc AND calls when it's possible - but many do the former but not the latter, and that's where I think both we and they are missing out. As for Nana, I too loved watching her before her latest round of self-censorship. I know she still does great pc. My problem is that she has burned me and targeted me, without any provocation. I don't take kindly to that. I don't anticipate spending a penny on her. But I'm sure she is awesome to most customers and everyone should enjoy any girl or ladyboy they wish. I really do like all the other girls, even if I don't always agree with how they perform.
RE: Nana-

mark.s.. > 17/12/2018, 05:52

(17/12/2018, 05:10)willmews Wrote: I agree and say repeatedly that girls should show for pc AND calls when it's possible - but many do the former but not the latter, and that's where I think both we and they are missing out. As for Nana, I too loved watching her before her latest round of self-censorship. I know she still does great pc. My problem is that she has burned me and targeted me, without any provocation. I don't take kindly to that. I don't anticipate spending a penny on her. But I'm sure she is awesome to most customers and everyone should enjoy any girl or ladyboy they wish. I really do like all the other girls, even if I don't always agree with how they perform.
good on you will. well said. you have a very well rounded approach
Next Oldest Next Newest

Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-

RE: Nana-