chrisman > 10/04/2012, 22:23
jesslloydfan > 10/04/2012, 22:28
(10/04/2012, 22:23)chrisman Wrote: What's dissapointing is that the original CoD was like 20 hours long and a total classic! They did such a good job of modern warfare, but it was just a bit short, but sadly that formula has just been rehashed ever since, short story, rely on multiplayer.I do like the story in the Modern Warfare games, it`s just that it`s so damn short on a long sitting you can complete 90% of it, i know they can`t neglect the multiplayer now (modern games sort of need a multiplayer especially shooters) but they should put equal effort into the single player.
chrisman > 10/04/2012, 22:33
Chillblane > 13/04/2012, 18:29
jesslloydfan > 15/04/2012, 03:28
(13/04/2012, 18:29)Chillblane Wrote: The issue with COD is that they base the game around multi player and they charge the earth for it. If you don't do multi player or you are not a crack elite noob killer then it's soo not worth the money.They can`t officially charge for the online on Playstation i don`t think due to the psn being free (not entirely sure if there are charges for the third one, not been able to get yet) but you are right though COD is online centric now and that isn`t a bad thing but there are too many hardcore nutters who play only COD that can ruin it.
iRaynerX > 15/04/2012, 10:33
yoss54 > 15/04/2012, 10:58