dVIOUS > 13/06/2013, 16:33
(13/06/2013, 16:08)clitterbug Wrote: I think turboimage is well better, ive used imagechunk in the past but it keeps fucking up and leaving the pics in your posts as just empty boxes? apart from an X and the word imagechunk, most unreliable!
Bickers32 > 13/06/2013, 16:46
(13/06/2013, 16:33)dVIOUS Wrote:id use imagechunk if you didnt have to click on every single pic/cap was /is such a ball ache so i use imagebam(13/06/2013, 16:08)clitterbug Wrote: I think turboimage is well better, ive used imagechunk in the past but it keeps fucking up and leaving the pics in your posts as just empty boxes? apart from an X and the word imagechunk, most unreliable!
That issue with imagechunk is now fixed.
Also,
You do not earn the bonus points that you normally would if your images aren't hosted on imagechunk, but you will ofcourse still earn regular points.
Hilary Briss > 13/06/2013, 16:54
(13/06/2013, 16:46)Bickers32 Wrote:(13/06/2013, 16:33)dVIOUS Wrote:id use imagechunk if you didnt have to click on every single pic/cap was /is such a ball ache so i use imagebam(13/06/2013, 16:08)clitterbug Wrote: I think turboimage is well better, ive used imagechunk in the past but it keeps fucking up and leaving the pics in your posts as just empty boxes? apart from an X and the word imagechunk, most unreliable!
That issue with imagechunk is now fixed.
Also,
You do not earn the bonus points that you normally would if your images aren't hosted on imagechunk, but you will ofcourse still earn regular points.
![[Image: wbcchurchsign.jpg]](https://i.imagechunk.com/w/b/wbcchurchsign.jpg)
Hilary Briss > 13/06/2013, 16:58
Clitterbug > 13/06/2013, 17:44
(13/06/2013, 16:33)dVIOUS Wrote:dvious am I missing something here m8? what do you mean 'bonus points' ive posted absolutely loads of posts with well over 140 characters, kinell ive written mini novels in here at times whilst ranting over something or other and ive posted many thousands of pics, ive never had more than two points for a post of any size with or without pics, are you saying I could be getting more if I use imagechunk?(13/06/2013, 16:08)clitterbug Wrote: I think turboimage is well better, ive used imagechunk in the past but it keeps fucking up and leaving the pics in your posts as just empty boxes? apart from an X and the word imagechunk, most unreliable!
That issue with imagechunk is now fixed.
Also,
You do not earn the bonus points that you normally would if your images aren't hosted on imagechunk, but you will ofcourse still earn regular points.
Blue_Wind > 15/06/2013, 04:18
Clitterbug > 18/06/2013, 00:22
chub > 18/06/2013, 01:30
oilman > 18/06/2013, 09:31
(18/06/2013, 01:30)chub Wrote: I never had a problem with the site before the upgrades, where the really needed or just something the guys thought would be good?
this is in no way a complaint, just curious is all. like how many people found the site slow and unusable before?
chub > 18/06/2013, 17:58
(18/06/2013, 09:31)oilman Wrote:(18/06/2013, 01:30)chub Wrote: I never had a problem with the site before the upgrades, where the really needed or just something the guys thought would be good?
this is in no way a complaint, just curious is all. like how many people found the site slow and unusable before?
Last night (shortly before the time of your post) the site was very slow; now it is working fine again.
I have to say, that in the past, the site was quite often very slow and unusable, but this never lasted that long. Now, it is fine, and the larger threads with lots of pictures are loading much more quickly - so that's got to be good!
Now if dVIOUS could just change the date format back, that would be great! :)