chrisman > 07/04/2012, 09:17
jesslloydfan > 07/04/2012, 12:13
Chillblane > 08/04/2012, 11:55
(07/04/2012, 12:13)jesslloydfan Wrote: ....Duke Nukem Forever, had a ridiculously long production and they still couldn't make a good game.
jesslloydfan > 08/04/2012, 12:59
(08/04/2012, 11:55)Chillblane Wrote: Actually the company who finally released Duke Nuken Forever was only making it since the release of Borderlands so 2 years topps. The original company who set out to make it got hooked on World of Warcraft and gave up.
But i take the point that it was not a good game.
If you want a really old school game that sucked i'd have to say DAly Thompsons Decathlon for the Spectrum zx128k it was all about mashing 2 buttons as fast as you could and then at the correct time hitting a 3rd button.
hornyguysi > 08/04/2012, 19:07
Chillblane > 09/04/2012, 18:18
(08/04/2012, 19:07)hornyguysi Wrote: i know im probs going back a very few years but i always thought lemmings was a really bad game that i could never get into so never really played it loads also the tennis game called actua tennis maybe it just because of the graphics
(08/04/2012, 12:59)jesslloydfan Wrote: Oh i didn't realise that Duke Nukem swapped hands in production i thought they just took a stupidly long time to develop, still seems like they could have made a better game in two years but there you go.
chrisman > 10/04/2012, 22:25
jesslloydfan > 16/04/2012, 03:10
(09/04/2012, 18:18)Chillblane Wrote:Oh right seems the Borderlands team didn`t put all that much effort into it, speaking of, what is Borderlands like anyway? i heard it was a similar style of game to Fallout, although i imagine with far less bugs and glitches than Fallout (which if i`m totally honest, only manages to avoid being considered a bad game to me because when it`s working and you can actually enjoy it it`s excellent and very inventive with all the unique side missions)(08/04/2012, 12:59)jesslloydfan Wrote: Oh i didn't realise that Duke Nukem swapped hands in production i thought they just took a stupidly long time to develop, still seems like they could have made a better game in two years but there you go.
It was done by the Borderlands team, they should have stuck to Borderlands 2 which would have been out by now if they hadn't made Duke
Chillblane > 16/04/2012, 22:53
(16/04/2012, 03:10)jesslloydfan Wrote:(09/04/2012, 18:18)Chillblane Wrote:Oh right seems the Borderlands team didn`t put all that much effort into it, speaking of, what is Borderlands like anyway? i heard it was a similar style of game to Fallout, although i imagine with far less bugs and glitches than Fallout (which if i`m totally honest, only manages to avoid being considered a bad game to me because when it`s working and you can actually enjoy it it`s excellent and very inventive with all the unique side missions)(08/04/2012, 12:59)jesslloydfan Wrote: Oh i didn't realise that Duke Nukem swapped hands in production i thought they just took a stupidly long time to develop, still seems like they could have made a better game in two years but there you go.
It was done by the Borderlands team, they should have stuck to Borderlands 2 which would have been out by now if they hadn't made Duke
jesslloydfan > 17/04/2012, 03:26
(16/04/2012, 22:53)Chillblane Wrote:Might have to get Borderlands then, sounds interesting and it did look good ages ago just could never decide (i'll now add it to my increasingly long list of games i can't afford but want to get lol) i'm guessing the multiplayer is one of them that very good despite the connection issues (always wondered why they didn't implement some sort of system like that with Fallout, it would be nice to have an allie who didn't get stuck behind a small rock and wander in front of your fire constantly)(16/04/2012, 03:10)jesslloydfan Wrote:(09/04/2012, 18:18)Chillblane Wrote:Oh right seems the Borderlands team didn`t put all that much effort into it, speaking of, what is Borderlands like anyway? i heard it was a similar style of game to Fallout, although i imagine with far less bugs and glitches than Fallout (which if i`m totally honest, only manages to avoid being considered a bad game to me because when it`s working and you can actually enjoy it it`s excellent and very inventive with all the unique side missions)(08/04/2012, 12:59)jesslloydfan Wrote: Oh i didn't realise that Duke Nukem swapped hands in production i thought they just took a stupidly long time to develop, still seems like they could have made a better game in two years but there you go.
It was done by the Borderlands team, they should have stuck to Borderlands 2 which would have been out by now if they hadn't made Duke
Borderlands is good, but to really enjoy it you should be playing it with 3 friends, the only issue there is that Gamespy is used to host it making it almost impossible to play multiplayer. I have 6 friends who own it and only one of us (out of 7) can successfully host a game!!!!!
Other than that it's fine, well it's a bit short but it's fun to play