vishybaby > 02/01/2012, 18:13
warchylduk > 02/01/2012, 18:39
Timm24 > 02/01/2012, 18:44
warchylduk > 02/01/2012, 18:48
(02/01/2012, 18:44)Timm24 Wrote: I reckon no need tonchange the studio at all. I mean obviously nicer studio would make a difference and would be a good thing but I'm sure that would be expensive.
Something that's much more accessible and would be a LOT more appreciated, by me anyway, is if they upgrade the STREAM QUALITY. It's not bad but if it was all super hd that would improve the channel a LOT IMO
Timm24 > 02/01/2012, 19:39
warchylduk > 02/01/2012, 19:45
(02/01/2012, 19:39)Timm24 Wrote: Well I'm just saying hd as in quality I don't know the technical side of video streaming but however they can to improve video quality would be awesome because elite tv webstream for example is better quality
An I don't know the cost but I do know for certain (cuz I've seen it mane times) is that many cam girls on sites like streamate have better quality feed than rampant. Don't get me wrong I love rampant but it seems like video quality could be improved ahead of a whole new studio maybe I'm wrong
jesslloydfan > 02/01/2012, 21:10
ineedawank > 02/01/2012, 21:26
vishybaby > 02/01/2012, 23:45
jd62 > 04/01/2012, 21:08
(02/01/2012, 18:39)warchylduk Wrote: the studio does get a redesign every now and then plus i am sure they share the building with babestation
the one thing that might be worth doing is drop sexstation name and has it as rampant tv as most people call it that anyway