• NEW LILLY pin 997
  • NEW LILLY pin 997

    stjohn66 > 09/07/2020, 13:17

    so Lilly has gone and been replaced by,,, LILLY, and that is not where the similarities end. they look strikingly similar, same frame. same long dark hair. same big hands ( i think anyway ) . i noticed she has already been behind the veil with someone ( not sure who but i think i can guess ) so not an easy introduction to her time here.
    stjohn
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    Covkid > 09/07/2020, 13:20

    It was with Opor and it was Lilly who started feeling Opor before they went "behind the curtain" so I would suggest they are friends as it wasn't something a new "girl" would do on only her second show, see my video: https://videos.rampant.tv/videos/lilly-a...41063.html
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    stjohn66 > 09/07/2020, 13:32

    thanks covkid. Opor was not who i had guessed at. strange use of the word 'FRIENDS' that is not the sort of behavior i indulge in with my 'friends' but then thai land is a strange place. maybe Lilly is just an out there kind of person. as to what type of person she is . did anybody get a glimpse behind the curtain and can they report back ?
    stjohn
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    Covkid > 09/07/2020, 13:57

    I don't think they did anything behind the curtain. Lilly went on to a group show earlier so in the interests of everyone here I went on but she didn't show anything at all despite being asked. Really a waste of tokens. I am surprised nobody has asked her on chat. Probably didn't want to do it as Amy was also on.
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    GrandDuke > 10/07/2020, 21:07

    Thanks for that video Covkid as I missed much of yesterday's shows and never saw that. She was certainly being very 'friendly' which seems to suggest a deeper relationship than just new workmates. Can you imagine doing that to a new employee at your place of work?

    The curtain did seem a bit superfluous though didn't it. They zoomed the camera right in to only show them from little more than their head and shoulders so they could have easily done the same without any curtain. Glad it wasn't Naomi's thick black tights though as they are a real passion killer.
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    GrandDuke > 10/07/2020, 21:10

    Lilly said that she was a lady when asked directly on the chat whether she was a ladyboy or not. That seems to be pretty conclusive as why say it if it is not true unless it was a language problem. She did do one chat reply in good English so it seems unlikely that it was a misunderstanding.

    But I said in my first post about her that she reminded me of the old Lilly. I actually thought that it was her at first until I realised that she was chunkier. Maybe she is related to her as the resemblance is striking.
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    Covkid > 11/07/2020, 16:50

    I can CONFIRM that Lilly has a pussy and no cock Smile :. I went in to pervecam with her on Saturday afternoon, although the buffering was very bad. She has a lovely hairy pussy, as well as great big nipples.
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    stjohn66 > 11/07/2020, 16:56

    oh yeah covkid. i have been mis-directed by you before. not sure whether i should take your word for it this time or wait for independent verification. i mean. exactly how bad was the buffering. was there open legged viewing ( because some of them are very clever you know ) was it from the rear or was is a frontal view. all these are variables which can change perspective.
    stjohn
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    GrandDuke > 11/07/2020, 17:05

    Haha stjohn66, once bitten twice shy. Lol. Still not prepared to take the risk it seems. Funnily enough I was giving her an intense gaze this afternoon when her shift started and she was wearing see thru (well sort of) pants and I couldn't detect any hint of a disconcerting bulge. I feel pretty confident now that we finally have another lady on the team and Covkid seems to have confirmed it as well. So the balance is slowly being redressed.
  • RE: NEW LILLY pin 997

    Covkid > 11/07/2020, 21:09

    (11/07/2020, 16:56)stjohn66 Wrote: oh yeah covkid. i have been mis-directed by you before. not sure whether i should take your word for it this time or wait for independent verification. i mean. exactly how bad was the buffering. was there open legged viewing ( because some of them are very clever you know ) was it from the rear or was is a frontal view. all these are variables which can change perspective.
    stjohn

    The buffering I referred to meant that I couldn't get in to pervecam at all on two occasions. When I did finally get in the picture was fine and very clear. It was a full frontal view, and the other comments in the Chat Box said "nice pussy". Give her a go yourself.