Mr P shows are they worth continuing.

[Colinpw]

Seeking the opinion of all members. A genuine question are the Mr P specials worth continuing. Last night the Alice/Mr P was so fake it was embarrassing, I know some guys get off on the fantasy but following the OnlyFans issue with Bella Thorne Alice claiming she is giving a blowjob when his cock is nowhere near her mouth is fake some might say borderline fraud.

I heard Sophie Hart actually did a good show a few weeks back but 1 out of the many is not good enough for the money that is charged.

Would be interesting to hear what others think about these shows.

[Troyspunks101]

Not sure be honest I had a look at them before can't normal see anything but when I have don't think much of it I know what you mean it looks kinda fake to me but I don't watch them much when there on anyway so I'm in the middle about it I rather have more 241 shows with two girls doing goals together and taking calls together or background with outfits shows. I rather they do the blowjob on the dildo gets me hard instead of the fake stuff. Like would rather see a Nicole and Alice show than a ,mrP and Alice but that's just me.
 

[zzksx!jjjjj]

The shows are great when done properly and there is no faking. Clearly some girls do not want real sex or blow jobs though so when they do a MR P show it is an insult to our intelligence and are better off not done at all. April Mae tonight had a tip goal for a facial from MR P. I assumed that this meant that she would give him a blow job climaxing in a happy ending facial. However, he never even appeared on screen at all. All we heard was someone come into the room and then someone off camera squirted something that looked like diluted milk all over her back and arse. A funny place to have your face if that is a facial! It looked so fake especially as it looked as though it was squirted from about 6 feet away. When does fake become fraud I wonder under the trade descriptions act. This gives the shows a bad name and it is fake moments like this which  prompted someone to raise this thread asking is it even worth continuing with this sham.

Some girls are real stars though and do the real thing and Sophie Hart is one of them. Blurring the picture though is a disaster and makes it entirely unwatchable. The best shows are where they cover the camera with some lacy panties with some holes and are partly see through. This a great tease and keeps people watching and getting horny which will lead to loads of business subsequently. Sophie has done both kinds of show but the half covered camera is definitely the one that works best for us and them. The advantage of this is that you can see the she really is being fucked or giving a blow job and that is then a massive turn on and a cue to start raking in money from pervcam and tips if there was a goal.

Anna Bailey also did a great show last week with Mr P which was real and definitely had a real blow job. She used the partly covered camera for it and until MR P moved the panties to totally block the view it let everyone see that she was really going for it and this really encouraged lots of people to go to pervcam for a proper view knowing that it was not fake. So lets keep doing the shows where it is real and letting us see that is the case so loads of us will go to pervcam and watch the action unhindered. If a girl is only prepared to do a fake show then better to do none at all I think. At least that way both the shows and the girls involved keep their integrity.

[burns72]

The shows are great when done properly and there is no faking. Clearly some girls do not want real sex or blow jobs though so when they do a MR P show it is an insult to our intelligence and are better off not done at all. April Mae tonight had a tip goal for a facial from MR P. I assumed that this meant that she would give him a blow job climaxing in a happy ending facial. However, he never even appeared on screen at all. All we heard was someone come into the room and then someone off camera squirted something that looked like diluted milk all over her back and arse. A funny place to have your face if that is a facial! It looked so fake especially as it looked as though it was squirted from about 6 feet away. When does fake become fraud I wonder under the trade descriptions act. This gives the shows a bad name and it is fake moments like this which  prompted someone to raise this thread asking is it even worth continuing with this sham.

Some girls are real stars though and do the real thing and Sophie Hart is one of them. Blurring the picture though is a disaster and makes it entirely unwatchable. The best shows are where they cover the camera with some lacy panties with some holes and are partly see through. This a great tease and keeps people watching and getting horny which will lead to loads of business subsequently. Sophie has done both kinds of show but the half covered camera is definitely the one that works best for us and them. The advantage of this is that you can see the she really is being fucked or giving a blow job and that is then a massive turn on and a cue to start raking in money from pervcam and tips if there was a goal.

Anna Bailey also did a great show last week with Mr P which was real and definitely had a real blow job. She used the partly covered camera for it and until MR P moved the panties to totally block the view it let everyone see that she was really going for it and this really encouraged lots of people to go to pervcam for a proper view knowing that it was not fake. So lets keep doing the shows where it is real and letting us see that is the case so loads of us will go to pervcam and watch the action unhindered. If a girl is only prepared to do a fake show then better to do none at all I think. At least that way both the shows and the girls involved keep their integrity.

The Anna Bailey show was with Dean Van Damme a former producer and star of the sexstation site who used to fuck the girls on the unleashed shows and was lucky enough to fuck Jess Lloyd. So he wasn't hired for a fake show so Alice would not do a show with him, but I agree that the fake shows are an embarrassment when you are supposed to be sucking a guy and you are moving your head near his belly button or getting fucked with his dick clearly hanging down and not even with a semi.

[Troyspunks101]

I completely agree what you guys have said I don't really watch the Mr P show much but when I see them I don't see much or nothing the bit I do see seem quiet fake but that's why I said 241 shows because in least you know what your getting there two girls and goals, phone calls and least you can request goals and normal they have a dildo as will so you not getting fake because you know what your getting with 241 shows I would rather they move to these instead as I saw some good ones recently would like to see more of them as there some good pairings you could do but that's just me again.

[Icydon]

I love the mr p shows ?? flick has joined the fun aswell ? would love Nicole snow to do a show ?

[Colinpw]

Flick may have got in on the act, but at £5 a min for group just to see what is going on I think it is a bit of a rip off. £8 a min if you are brave enough to click prv. These shows should at worst have a blurred screen you can then see if anyone is actually behind the cam.

[jayc]

Well another waste of time! All behind the perv cam. I remember when this site used to be good!

[Troyspunks101]

It's interesting hearing every ones different options on this subject I have agree with Colinpw which I think £5 a minute is a lot when you think about it and you don't even know what you getting sometimes like the flick on I have been wanting to see what it all about but not for that price and I wondering if that was even real as I keep seeing it on there clicked and says something I a taster lol to see if it worth the money.

[zzksx!jjjjj]

I said earlier on the thread that the way to attract business on the shows is for the MR P show to be real and not faked which rules out nearly all the girls who do the shows who are not willing to do that. Anna Bailey and Sophie Hart are the definite exceptions to this and do real shows whilst Chloe Lloyd gave a real hand-job tit wank 3 weeks ago too. Alexxa Vice also did a real show about 2 months ago as well. But apart from that, everyone else appears to do fake shows.

The best approach is to have lacy panties over the camera and have no blurring or pervcam only view. Then people can see just enough to know for sure that they are not being tricked into paying a shed of money to see nothing at all. Pervcam business can then go through the roof and everyone leaves satisfied and not cheated. I suspect though that the reason why this is rarely the approach taken is because letting you see anything at all would only convince you that it was fake before you even considered pervcam, so keeping you blind before you pay your money is a better plan even though it is dishonest and will lead to a lot of dissatisfied customers who may not return.