Is sexstation running low on babes as i have noticed lately that ella pearl seem to be on alot of the time . has anyone else noticed this ?
RE: is sexstation running low on babes
JUNIOR88 > 15/07/2012, 07:23
well i noticed that kimmy haze has been on alot not that there anything wrong with that but half the girls they say are joining never come
RE: is sexstation running low on babes
Timm24 > 15/07/2012, 09:58
Yea Ella and kimmy are the reliable ones, they are often replacements when other babes don't show up. I don't think they are that short of babes it's just out of the ones they do have a lot only come on once a week or less
RE: is sexstation running low on babes
warchylduk > 15/07/2012, 10:21
i wonder if ella and kimmy get more shifts as they are local to the studio
RE: is sexstation running low on babes
Bickers32 > 15/07/2012, 11:12
ella did say she lived close to the studio so id say yes
RE: is sexstation running low on babes
Timm24 > 15/07/2012, 11:30
tammy used to be on a LOT and used to fill in for other girls as well, but not so much anymore... i don't mind that i'm not the biggest fan (though defo appreciate the enthusiasm she brings), i don't like how charmaine's shifts have become less frequent, tiffany kingston too. and i hope tamara doesn't desert this channel completely for redlightcentral
RE: is sexstation running low on babes
hardcore69 > 15/07/2012, 22:37
yeah a couple of the girls are appearing a lot. i know sugar is off for a serious reason but the other girls i dont know why they havent been appearing on the show
RE: is sexstation running low on babes
jesslloydfan > 15/07/2012, 23:59
I don`t think it`s that they are running low, just that some have left well one i`m sure of (Lexi Ward must have left i`ve not seen her on for ages) and some of the babes live further away from london which is why if any of them can`t make it the babes that live within or close to london end up in more. And obviously as hardcore69 said Sugar has a fair reason for not having any shifts lately.