dl > 15/08/2013, 16:05
FantasticMR > 15/08/2013, 16:41
StrumSolo > 15/08/2013, 16:44
FantasticMR > 15/08/2013, 16:46
RussyRover > 15/08/2013, 16:54
StrumSolo > 15/08/2013, 17:02
RussyRover > 15/08/2013, 17:10
dl > 15/08/2013, 18:58
(15/08/2013, 16:41)FantasticMR Wrote: I've always been under the impression that all of our calls, texts, emails are monitored. It's one thing to tell people they have their right to privacy or for the most part allow them to assume that they do but I mean really, what are the chances that there's no snooping without going through the 'correct' channels?fMR i am one of the hacked . I currently have a injunction against me from the people who broke through my firewall . Case of mistaken identity they said . They mistakenly took 12 years worth of research .
Liken it to discovering your angst teens journal in their bedroom and tell me that you wouldn't want to know what's making them tick, be such a sod or find out about the oppressive parent you are causing such a degree of Stockholm Syndrome to your offspring. It would be hard to walk away from that option and that is based on someone, you would in an ideal world love. Would you then also use the info involved to shape the sprog to what you see is fit for them and in turn fit for you by pushing your agenda.
So bring it back again to people who don't know you let alone have to care about you as an individual so must instead push their agenda by the gaining information on the mass as a whole. Yeah.... I think their probably already having a look.