• Options
• Login
• Desktop Style
• Recent Posts
• Most Popular

Amy

• Amy

• RE: Amy

  tony2907 > 28/12/2018, 08:25

  Well duke and derry its a great shame that it has come to this The ability to disable somebody's chat should never have been given to them in the first place if they cant use it responsibly just to stop the arseholes

• RE: Amy

  GrandDuke > 28/12/2018, 14:14

  It sounds as though they can now take it to new levels though with the comment that Bucket made. He said that he could not even phone her when he first tried as he was blocked. Hence his expletive reaction. That helps make sense of the wording that Amy used when she was talking about somebody who I assume had at least 2 identities. She said that she always blocks him - both of them. She was not using the words chat disabled but blocking. So it seems that she can now block you from calling the channel (or all channels?) with her new found powers.
  
  I have posted elsewhere that I would not try phoning when my chat was disabled but this now looks like a smart move if she blocks you totally from phoning any channel as well at the same time.

• RE: Amy

  GrandDuke > 28/12/2018, 14:18

  Thanks for confirming that Amy's displeasure is about me recording shows. This is nothing new, I have been doing it for years and Amy has known about it all this time. I am entitled to as a VIP and am doing nothing wrong by doing so. The only person doing wrong is Amy and now Nana with their reaction to it.
  
  But if that is their big hang-up, why are Tony and stjohn not abused in a similar manner, as some days they record even more shows than I do? That is something I cannot puzzle out.

• RE: Amy

  GrandDuke > 28/12/2018, 14:22

  I do agree though that Amy is still doing great shows and is likely to be a focus of many of my videos as a result. She seems to be upping her game as well as many of the other girls which is making the shows pretty exciting these days. Shame then that it is clouded by the bad humour that hangs over the show from my own perspective.

• RE: Amy

  Buck > 28/12/2018, 14:37

  I don’t get it dude. Recording is a thing we use. When I say we...not me. After speaking to Amy she was cool. Took money off me no problem.
  You will have to find out why she has a problem. In my experience it is because you have compared her to another and not in her favour.
  Real life. Not on here.

• RE: Amy

  GrandDuke > 28/12/2018, 16:58

  I should be clear that when I have spoken to Amy in the past, including my last phone call which was probably a few months ago now, I have been nothing but complimentary to her in the past. Never have I had a bad word to say about her and the same could be true of her, as she said how much nicer I am than many she knows. 
  
  The only hint of bad feeling came when she talked about people who record pervcam shows and put them on the internet for others to watch. I agreed with her about how bad that is and how it was totally unacceptable. Is she starting to confuse our legal recording with this illegal activity. Surely she is far too intelligent for that but her behaviour suggests otherwise.
  
  I have detected a hint of jealousy over my liking for Daisy, as she has made fun of me saying that the reason why I have not called her for so long is because I like Daisy more. This was just a bit of playful teasing I thought but I am left wondering whether there was more to it than that now. None of those explanations though explain why Nana should start to get involved now as well, disabling me within 5 minutes of entering her stream this morning. I rarely record her, as her shows usually do not excite me and others record her far more who are fans of hers. So I am still perplexed but I have no intention of rewarding Amy's bad behaviour by calling her and paying her money to explain herself. It would not be a pleasant conversation I suspect and may result in her phone being thrown out of the studio, as has been known in the past.
  
  I spoke with Nana last week on the chat box and we were quite civil. she said that I am not her type and told me why. I admired her honesty and left it at that. So suddenly banning me from the chat without any other comments being made by me seems as strange as Amy's recent behaviour. I never did understand this channel and clearly I am not getting any better at it.

• RE: Amy

  tony2907 > 28/12/2018, 17:00

  I find that very strange and I don't believe it for one moment bucket Goodness knows where your experience comes from bucket but I think its a load of rubbish and certainly has no bearing here -  In all the time I have been using thai chat I have never heard duke have anything other than support praise and admiration for Amy and I believe he holds her in the same high esteem that we all do

• RE: Amy

  GrandDuke > 28/12/2018, 17:10

  I think your post must have crossed with mine Tony. I have only been critical of Amy in recent weeks over her behaviour towards me and that seems justified. It is highly unlikely that she would leave my chat box up all day and I start to engage in conversation there after what has been happening.
  
  However, if she did and I did feel like engaging at that time, it would be useful if she approached me positively with a message to ring her. I might do that then but would not want to whilst the atmosphere was still toxic.

• RE: Amy

  Buck > 29/12/2018, 10:09

  I should have used the word “one” rather than you. It did sound like a personal dig. No malice intended.

• RE: Amy

  GrandDuke > 03/01/2019, 01:01

  Admin have said that they have sent an email to the manager of the studio in Thailand over Amy's behaviour on disabling my chat. They clearly agree that it is unreasonable behaviour.
  
  However, I expect that Amy will be spitting feathers when she next sees me on her chat having heard that I have complained about her.
  It probably won't help my long term relationship with her I think.
• Next Oldest Next Newest